<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Narrative Medicine &#187; placebo</title>
	<atom:link href="https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/tag/placebo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it</link>
	<description>Medicina Narrativa Digitale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Il placebo funziona anche senza inganno quando è narrativo</title>
		<link>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/il-placebo-funziona-anche-senza-inganno-quando-e-narrativo/</link>
		<comments>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/il-placebo-funziona-anche-senza-inganno-quando-e-narrativo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuela Valente]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicina Narrativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicina narrativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrazioni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMNI News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/?p=5401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Articolo di OMNI News Non è un segreto che al successo di tanti a trattamenti medici o psicologici concorra in misura significativa l’effetto placebo, una reazione fisiologica positiva che sarebbe indotta dalle aspettative del paziente. Perché ciò avvenga non è ancora chiaro – potrebbe trattarsi di un condizionamento dovuto a precedenti esperienze di cura positive o [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="more-5401"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Articolo di <strong><a href="https://www.omni-web.org/placebo-funziona-narrativo/" target="_blank">OMNI News</a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Non è un segreto che al successo di tanti a trattamenti medici o psicologici concorra in misura significativa l’effetto placebo, una <a href="https://www.omni-web.org/parole-come-farmaci/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reazione fisiologica</a> positiva che sarebbe indotta dalle aspettative del paziente. Perché ciò avvenga non è ancora chiaro – potrebbe trattarsi di un condizionamento dovuto a precedenti esperienze di cura positive o al contesto, l’essere oggetto di cura, di attenzione da parte del medico. Fatto sta che sono sempre più numerosi gli studi che dimostrano l’efficacia del placebo, in particolare in quelle condizioni patologiche dove la componente psicologica è importante, come dolore, ansia, depressione, difficoltà motorie. In questi casi, preparati privi di principi attivi, somministrati a pazienti in buova fede (che ignorano la loro inefficacia), possono realmente alleviare o risolvere i disturbi. Perché allora non utilizzarlo anche nella pratica clinica? <a href="https://www.omni-web.org/placebo-funziona-narrativo/" target="_blank">continua a leggere</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/il-placebo-funziona-anche-senza-inganno-quando-e-narrativo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conversation Placebo</title>
		<link>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-conversation-placebo/</link>
		<comments>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-conversation-placebo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuela Valente]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicina Narrativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/?p=4754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my daily work as a primary care internist, I see no letup from pain. Every single patient, it seems, has an aching shoulder or a bum knee or a painful back &#160; Danielle Ofri, The New York Times “Our bodies evolved to live about 40 years,” I always explain, “and then be finished off [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In my daily work as a primary care internist, I see no letup from pain. Every single patient, it seems, has an aching shoulder or a bum knee or a painful back</em><span id="more-4754"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Immagine6.png"><img class=" size-medium wp-image-4755 aligncenter" src="https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Immagine6-300x213.png" alt="Immagine" width="300" height="213" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Danielle Ofri</strong>, <strong><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/opinion/sunday/the-conversation-placebo.html?ref=opinion&amp;_r=2" target="_blank">The New York Times</a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="531" data-total-count="531">“Our bodies evolved to live about 40 years,” I always explain, “and then be finished off by a mammoth or a microbe.” Thanks to a century of staggering medical progress, we now live past 80, but evolution hasn’t caught up; the cartilage in our joints still wears down in our 40s, and we are more obese and more sedentary than we used to be, which doesn’t help.</p>
<p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="378" data-total-count="909">So it’s no surprise that chronic <a class="meta-classifier" title="In-depth reference and news articles about Arthritis and Rheumatism." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/arthritis/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">arthritis</a> and back pain are the <a href="http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(12)01036-1/fulltext">second and third most common</a> non-acute reasons that people go to the doctor and that pain costs America up to <a href="http://www.painmed.org/patientcenter/facts_on_pain.aspx">$635 billion</a> annually. The pain remedies developed by the pharmaceutical industry are only modestly effective, and they have side effects that range from nausea and <a class="meta-classifier" title="In-depth reference and news articles about Constipation." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/constipation/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">constipation</a> to addiction and death.</p>
<p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="147" data-total-count="1056">What’s often overlooked is that the simple conversation between doctor and patient can be as potent an analgesic as many treatments we prescribe.</p>
<p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="608" data-total-count="1664">In 2014, researchers in Canada did an interesting <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309616">study</a> about the role of communication in the treatment of chronic back pain. Half the patients in the study received mild electrical stimulation from physical therapists, and half received sham stimulation (all the equipment is set up, but the electrical current is never activated). Sham treatment — placebo — worked reasonably well: These patients experienced a 25 percent reduction in their levels of pain. The patients who got the real stimulation did even better, though; their pain levels decreased by 46 percent. So the treatment itself does work. <strong><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/opinion/sunday/the-conversation-placebo.html?ref=opinion&amp;_r=2" target="_blank">continua a leggere</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-conversation-placebo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
