<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Narrative Medicine &#187; medical practice</title>
	<atom:link href="https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/tag/medical-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it</link>
	<description>Medicina Narrativa Digitale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Trouble With Evidence-Based Medicine, the &#8216;Brand&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-trouble-with-evidence-based-medicine-the-brand/</link>
		<comments>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-trouble-with-evidence-based-medicine-the-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuela Valente]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicina Narrativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital narrative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence based medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicina narrativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicina narrativa digitale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pazienti online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/?p=3890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems as though it&#8217;s not enough to just advocate for an improvement to medical practice. People want to entirely &#8220;re-brand&#8221; medicine instead. As though one facet of practice can define the whole. In the case of evidence-based medicine &#8212; &#8220;EBM&#8221; &#8212; the claim of the brand has always been a bit overblown. Don&#8217;t get [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as though it&#8217;s not enough to just advocate for an improvement to <strong>medical practice</strong>. People want to entirely &#8220;re-brand&#8221; medicine instead. As though one facet of practice can define the whole. In the case of <strong>evidence-based medicine</strong> &#8212; &#8220;EBM&#8221; &#8212; the claim of the brand has always been a bit overblown.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong: I&#8217;m enthusiastic about evidence, and think strong evidence is invaluable for medicine. But the EBM movement and brand &#8211; that&#8217;s more complicated.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0745660851.html" target="_blank">Social movements</a></strong> can be valuable. Like-minded people establishing organizations and forming loose communities can really spread ideas and influence. I always seem to be in one or another. There are risks, though, even when the core idea is beneficial. Movements develop self-interests. It&#8217;s hard to keep them from drifting into collision with the public interest. The EBM movement hasn&#8217;t avoided that. <a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Blogs/ThirdOpinion/52540" target="_blank">continua a leggere</a></p>
<p>Articolo di <strong>Hilda Bastian</strong> su <strong>MedPageToday</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://digitalnarrativemedicine.com/it/the-trouble-with-evidence-based-medicine-the-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
